Hormuz
Discussion focused on whether China’s import management can cushion a Hormuz disruption and reduce the associated geopolitical risk premium 1. Anton Likhodedov argued that the disruption’s duration, residual flows, bypass capacity, demand destruction and inventories determine the effective shortfall, while noting that lower prices could prolong the disruption 34. On Macro Voices, Erik Townsend said the Hormuz crisis remained unresolved and could continue weighing on markets 2.
Where the voices land
All voices 1 voice1 high risk
High risk
- ALAnton LikhodedovHigh risk Sees the geopolitical risk premium around Hormuz as less one-sided than commonly assumed, since China's ability to manage import volumes acts as a shock absorber, though China alone cannot handle a Hormuz closure. “China ability to manage import volumes acts as a shock absorber (which we are seeing now) thereby reducing the premium” Open the post Good article. As I said a few times - despite … · 16 Jun
1 high risk
Mentions
4 in June 2026Stories it travels in
i
The stories
- ○ a voice, on the left
- ◌ a voice raising half of these
- ● a subject, on the right, under its story
- ⌒ a line is a voice raising a subject — thicker, more items; colour is the story
The stories this entity travels in: on the right, each story with the subjects seen alongside it; on the left, the voices that raised them, and a line for every subject a voice raised, bundled by story. Tap a voice to light everything it raises, a subject for who raised it, a story for its own lines. The crumb goes back.
Who brings it up
- Anton Likhodedov 3 mentions
- Larry McDonald 1 mention
- Erik Townsend 1 mention
- Patrick Ceresna 1 mention
See what your own voices say about Hormuz, every morning.
Start a desk